I used to say that, as Solicitor General, I made three arguments in every case. First came the one I had planned – as I thought, logical, coherent, complete. Second was the one actually presented – interrupted, incoherent, disjointed, disappointing. The third was the utterly devastating argument that I thought of after going to bed that night.
Reprinted in the Cornell Law Quarterly (Fall 1951) (full text). Also cite "Advocacy Before the Supreme Court," 37 A.B.A.J. 801, 803 (1951)


